Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion
Date
Msg-id 199812130428.XAA14066@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion
List pgsql-hackers
> It's time to re-implement sequences! When they were implemented
> ~ 1.5 year ago there was no GRANT/REVOKE on VIEWs and so
> I had to create table for each sequence.
> There should be one system table - pg_sequence. One record
> for each sequence will be inserted into this table and
> one VIEW will be created: 

I thought you wanted a single table to prevent concurrent access/update
contension?


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)