Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
Date
Msg-id 3727.913585554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> ... So, should I make that change in both trees, or just in the
> development tree? My recommendation is to be *really* conservative and
> not change it around for v6.4.1, since there may be a supported platform
> which doesn't conform to our assumptions.

Well, we have a bug report against 6.4, so my inclination is to change
it in both trees.  We know that the current code is broken on at least
one major platform.  I think that outweighs the unproven possibility
that the other way might be broken somewhere...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux