Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)
Date
Msg-id 2917.917377254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Before this patch is applied, havae we determined wheteher or not its even
> a useful thing to pursue?  I thought the general conscious was that, for
> us, it wasn't...

If we can demonstrate through profiling that there's someplace where
using alloca offers a worthwhile speedup, then let's go for it.

But, until we find such a hotspot, I'd be inclined not to spend
configure cycles on testing for alloca...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: lorenzo@argon.roma2.infn.it
Date:
Subject: dump doesn't save views and blobs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage?