Syntax errors in current tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain |
---|---|
Subject | Syntax errors in current tree |
Date | |
Msg-id | m10274q-0000bmC@druid.net Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
really hesitate to make this criticism given all the work people are doing on the system and all the great features and fixes that are being added but could we please make it a hard and fast rule that nothing gets added into the tree until the person adding it has at least compiled the source, if not a full regression test. I have finally jumped in and tried to add full primary key support but I keep stumbling over simple syntax errors in files I am not working on but that keep me from fully testing my own changes. Here's what I get compiling gram.y[c]. gcc -I../../include -I../../backend -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -I.. -Wno-error -c gram.c-o gram.o /usr/local/share/bison.simple: In function `yyparse': /usr/local/share/bison.simple:327: warning: implicit declaration of function `yyerror' /usr/local/share/bison.simple:387: warning: implicit declaration of function `yylex' gram.y:2797: `forUpdate' undeclared (first use in this function) gram.y:2797: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once gram.y:2797: for each function it appears in.) gram.y:2800: syntax error before `->' gram.y:2800: syntax error before `)' gram.y:2804: `n' undeclared (first use in this function) gram.y:2815: case label not within a switch statement gram.y:2834: break statement not within loop or switch gram.y:2835: case label not within a switch statement gram.y:2838: break statement not within loop or switch gram.y:2839: case label not within a switch statement gram.y:2843: break statement not within loop or switch ...etc for many more lines. I assume that line 2800 in gram.y is missing a paren and should have the following change. *** ../src.original/./backend/parser/gram.y Sun Jan 17 23:49:29 1999 --- ./backend/parser/gram.y Sun Jan 17 23:59:13 1999 *************** *** 2797,2803 **** first_select>forUpdate = $3; $$ = (Node *)first_select; } ! if ((SelectStmt *)$$)->forUpdate != NULL) { SelectStmt *n = (SelectStmt *)$1; --- 2797,2803 ---- first_select>forUpdate = $3; $$ = (Node *)first_select; } ! if (((SelectStmt *)$$)->forUpdate != NULL) { SelectStmt *n = (SelectStmt*)$1; But I can't tell what should be done for the missing declaration for forUpdate. Can whoever added this please complete it. It appears 4 times in the file. Further, backend/libpq/pqcomprim.c is missing a header that causes the compile to fail. *** ../src.original/./backend/libpq/pqcomprim.c Sun Jan 17 23:43:29 1999 --- ./backend/libpq/pqcomprim.c Sun Jan 17 23:43:43 1999 *************** *** 1,5 **** --- 1,6 ---- #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> + #include <errno.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> Sorry if I seem a little frustrated. It's only because I am. This isn't the first time this has happened while I was trying to work on the code. I don't think a full compile after extracting your diffs but before sending them in is so much to ask, is it? I'm not, after all, asking for full regression testing. Anyway, I have (I think) all the changes needed to put full primary key support in. As soon as I can test them I'll send them in. Or maybe I should send them in now without fully testing them. (Wry joke.) -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
pgsql-hackers by date: