Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code
Date
Msg-id 36B15292.3DD68C96@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to TEMP table code  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> The basic question is whether this is the proper way to do temp 
> tables.

I haven't looked at the patches, but fwiw I would have tried it about
the same way. No need to touch pg_class if the info is
session-specific...
                     - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed)
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed)