Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed
Date
Msg-id 36AF5FB9.5F11BBE9@krs.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates.  They should work
> > now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.
> 
> Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
> The regression tests look a lot better than they did.  The "union"
> test is still failing by adding a bunch of
> 
>         NOTICE:  equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal
> 
> lines to the expected output.  Anybody know what's causing that?

Type 600 is Query node. Attempt to compare Queries?
Try gdb with break point @ equalfuncs.c:746...

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats