Thread: regression test HAVING fixed

I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates.  They should work
now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates.  They should work
> now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.

Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
The regression tests look a lot better than they did.  The "union"
test is still failing by adding a bunch of
NOTICE:  equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal

lines to the expected output.  Anybody know what's causing that?
        regards, tom lane

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates.  They should work
> > now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.
> 
> Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
> The regression tests look a lot better than they did.  The "union"
> test is still failing by adding a bunch of
> 
>         NOTICE:  equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal
> 
> lines to the expected output.  Anybody know what's causing that?

Type 600 is Query node. Attempt to compare Queries?
Try gdb with break point @ equalfuncs.c:746...

Vadim