Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again
Date
Msg-id 19990122083730.C2827@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 03:08:20PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I still wonder if the for-update-tests in SelectStmt: are okay. Shouldn't
> > the test check for intersect_present=TRUE instead of intersectClause !=
> > NULL?
> 
> Looks like they are the same.  Both are true or false.

But I think intersectClause is set to op regardless if there is an intersect
clause at all. Or did I miss something?

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] about RULES
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs