Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Wetzel
Subject Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
Date
Msg-id 199901062238.XAA03489@cat.turbocat.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>

> > insert a few row in a table (>50000) and do
> > delete from mytable;
> > vacuum verbose  analyze;
> >
> > Why is this that slow?
>
> Analyze checks every column in every row.

even if you only type "vacuum verbose" it takes _very_ long.

I deleted _all_ records with "delete from mytable;" before.
A drop and a new create is faster. But what is when you delete (maybe
100000) rows but keep 100 in the table?

I use 6.4.2 on NetBSD/i486 (that box makes gets 12MBytes/sec via the
filesystem out of the drives)
---
   _  _
 _(_)(_)_  David Wetzel, Turbocat's Development,
(_) __ (_) Buchhorster Strasse, D-16567 Muehlenbeck/Berlin, FRG,
  _/  \_   Fax +49 33056 82835 NeXTmail dave@turbocat.de
 (______)  http://www.turbocat.de/
           DEVELOPMENT * CONSULTING * ADMINISTRATION

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQLJ
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long