Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again
Date
Msg-id 199901232131.QAA05100@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again  (Michael Meskes <Michael.Meskes@usa.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again  (Michael Meskes <Michael.Meskes@usa.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> But isn't the pure existance of for update enough to have an error in the
> else branch?
> 
> And can't we get the same error in the if branch as well with a having
> clause or something like that?

But we have those tests at the end, after the if/else, don't we?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: UNION regress test is failing
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces