Re: [HACKERS] Patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Patches
Date
Msg-id 199901310538.AAA10037@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patches  ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain <darcy@druid.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Patches
List pgsql-hackers
> I sent in a patch for createuser almost a week ago and I was wondering
> what the procedure is.  I haven't seen the patch applied but I also
> haven't seen it rejected.  I understand that not every one of my little
> gems is going to make it in but I hope there is some sort of closure
> method built into the process.  In this case I think I have a useful
> little addition to createuser but if I am alone, it isn't important
> enough to diverge from the standard distribution.  I just need to
> know one way or the other.
> 
> In fact, this is the second time I sent in a similar patch for createuser
> and I never heard anything about the first time either and that was before
> 6.4 was released.

I have it.  When I am doing my own development, I don't apply patches
from the list.   They stay in my mailbox, and get applied before beta
starts.  If someone else applies it, I remove my copy.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Charles Hornberger
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules