Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> These are good points. Can you post the patch again? I deleted it.
I bounced it directly to you rather than reposting to the list.
> Sounds like it would be safe. I am interested in const-ify-ing the
> backend code, if possible. It does offer a level of code checking that
> we don't currently have.
Me too but as I said, this patch doesn't do that. It only const-ifies
the the arguments to an external interface.
> The only issue is that is has to be done pretty exhaustively. If you
> don't, your new const function parameters start passing params to
> functions that takes non-const params, and warnings start to fly.
I compiled the entire tree without any warnings so I assume that the
changes wound up being pretty localized.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
