Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ...
Date
Msg-id 36B2F168.E1C5FDAF@trust.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ...  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Handling of SELECT FOR UPDATE OF > 1 relations is ever more
> > > complex. While processing tuples (more than 1 tuple may be
> > > returned by join) from child plan P1 created for tuple of table
> >
> > I don't think Informix allows FOR UPDATE in a multi-table select.
> 
> Oracle does. I don't know about SyBase, DB2 etc.
> In any case - this is implemented already -:)
>

When MS Access came out they made a big fuss about this ability, 
claiming that they were the first ones to implement this.

I'm not sure in what category they claimed they were first ;)

-------------------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick
Next
From: Ian Grant
Date:
Subject: ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed