Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Broytmann
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin
Date
Msg-id Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990125190635.18860B-100000@sun.med.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> Could you phrase the query in the same style as most of the other tests
> (a style we inherited from the original sources), where the first column
> is a select of an empty string with the table count as the label? I
> would suggest something like:
> 
> SELECT '' AS one,
>   datetime('1994-01-01', '11:00') AS "Sat Jan 01 11:00:00 1994 PST";
  I got my style from the lines above my test. There are things like:

SELECT ('now'::datetime - 'current'::datetime) AS "ZeroSecs";
  "Sat Jan 01 11:00:00 1994 PST" looks bad as a result, I think.
  Of course, I can recreate the patch, but should I?

Oleg.
----  Oleg Broytmann     http://members.tripod.com/~phd2/     phd2@earthling.net          Programmers don't die, they
justGOSUB without RETURN.
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin
Next
From: Oleg Broytmann
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin