Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources
Date
Msg-id 199903210313.WAA07331@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, I made the change.  It works now with special entries for %4 and 4%
> > in the grammer, similar to our handling of -4:
> 
> Hmm, is that an adequate solution?  Are you sure there are no other
> operators like % ?

Not sure.  I know I only changed % to have precedence like /.  No one is
complaining, and I think the problems are restricted to +,-,*,/, and %. 
Should I fix any of these other ones?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: check_primary_key is busted too
Next
From: Michael Davis
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] min() and max() causing aborts