Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored?
Date
Msg-id 28667.925480585@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to -T option ignored?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> It seems that postgres does not accept -T option. Checking the source,
> I found that T is not given to getopt() while there is a code to parse
> the -T option. Is there any reason for this?

Looks like a garden-variety oversight from here.  While you're fixing
it, I suggest making the order of the getopt() list match the order of
the entries in the big switch statement; the postmaster does it that
way, and that made it a whole lot easier to see that things matched...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: can't compile
Next
From: "Charles C. Bennett, Jr."
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage