Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test
Date
Msg-id m10jIbQ-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to rules regression test  ("Patrick Welche" <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] rules regression test
List pgsql-hackers
>
> The rules test is the only that fails for me under NetBSD/i386, and this
> seems simply to be due to using a different userid. The expected result
> has viewowner=pgsql, my result has viewowner=postgres. I suspect that had
> I run "gmake runtest" as some other userid with access to the regression
> database some of those rows may have had yet a different viewowner. Would
> it be a good idea to omit viewowner in the test as per the following
> patches? (Less luck on NetBSD/arm32 - looks similar to someone elses
> posting for the mac port)
>

    Sorry,

    me again due to latest changes - will fix.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE does not drop a table completely
Next
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Misleading Error Message