Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY
Date
Msg-id 1680.927592013@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> Today I tried my test script (many tables joining) and got a crash.
> It works several days before. CPU usage shows only 5% loading during
> this test.  what postgres is doing ?  Hmm, just rerun the test and it
> works :-) OK, one more again and it crashed. Again - works. Again -
> crashed, crashed, crashed. Very unstable situation.

Oh dear ... can you provide a backtrace from one of the crashes?

> Does anybody tried sqlbench, posted by
> Edmund ? I tried several times on Linux box, FreeBSD box with current cvs
> and it never finished. RAM usage during the test was about 11-13 Mb 
> and CPU usage was extremly low - 5-9% only !

It ran through to completion for me, but took hours.  (Unfortunately
I only have access to one machine that has 700Mb of free disk space,
and I mustn't shut off the data collection task that is its primary load.
So I'm stuck with taking a long time to try the sqlbench stuff...
it does seem to work, but I can't say much about performance...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK?