Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> Table with an element of type inet, will show "0.0.0.0/0" as "00/0"
Is that an error? From the discussions with Paul Vixie, I think that
that is the correct way to output it. Note that you can always use
host() to get the full string for the host part at least.
> When creating a table with either type inet or type cidr as a primary,unique
> key, the "198.68.123.0/24" and "198.68.123.0/27" are considered equal
I guess I'll take a stab at it. I just need to know which of the following
is true.
198.68.123.0/24 < 198.68.123.0/27 198.68.123.0/24 > 198.68.123.0/27
Also, is it possible that the current behaviour is what we want? It seems
to me that if you make a network a primary key, you probably want to prevent
overlap. What we have does that.
> add ability to add comments to system tables using table/colname combination
Why not just add comments to pg_description?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
