On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Probably no reason for the transaction id. I don't remember that being
> used at all.
Do you mean that there is no reason for the xid to exist, as it is not
used? If so, then may I humbly request that it be left in for another
six months in the hopes of using a transaction processing monitor to
distribute postgres across multiple machines safely? I'll need the xid
if and when I start that project, which will be after I finish the
TPM. 8^)
--
Todd Graham Lewis Postmaster, MindSpring Enterprises
tlewis@mindspring.net (800) 719-4664, x22804
"A pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood." -- George S. Patton
