> On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Probably no reason for the transaction id. I don't remember that being
> > used at all.
>
> Do you mean that there is no reason for the xid to exist, as it is not
> used? If so, then may I humbly request that it be left in for another
> six months in the hopes of using a transaction processing monitor to
> distribute postgres across multiple machines safely? I'll need the xid
> if and when I start that project, which will be after I finish the
> TPM. 8^)
No, I don't recommend removing it, but just not storing it in the lock
system. There is no need for it there.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
