Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom, can you identify any of the array items as fixed? Should we
> assume they are all fixed unless someone reports them broken?
No, that would be unduly optimistic :-(. I have fixed one or two
array-related bugs, but I haven't made a serious push on it; several
of the test cases that are in my to-do list still fail.
> * aggregates on array indexes crash backend
I believe I have fixed that one, at least.
> * select t[1] from foo fails, select count(foo.t[1]) from foo crashes
This item is a duplicate: the first part refers to the same thing as
> * array index references without table name cause problems
(which is as yet unfixed) and the second refers to the aggregate problem.
> * change the library/backend interface to use network byte order
Is there something I'm missing? This has been true for a long while...
> * -Allow DISTINCT on view
I think this is not done...
regards, tom lane
