Re: [HACKERS] Re: sequences vs. transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vazsonyi Peter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: sequences vs. transactions
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.04.9905161510250.3625-100000@sp1.szif.hu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sequences vs. transactions  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Sequence numbers are not re-used like normal transactions.  The reason
> for this is that we would have to lock the sequence table for the entire
> duration of the transaction until it was committed if we wanted to do
> that.
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
>   maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> 
Correct. ;-/. Thanx.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] select + order by
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Syntax of LOCK TABLE ...