> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Does this mean we are not allowed to use "U"? I think this is leagal
> >> according to the standard C grammer.
>
> > Well, it seems BSD indent mucks up 0x7fU, so I would prefer if we didn't
> > use it.
>
> If pgindent mucks up standard C constructs then pgindent is broken.
>
> This is not open to debate --- if you are going to run our entire
> source base through pgindent just a few days before every release,
> then the tool has to be something we can have 100 percent, no-questions-
> asked confidence in. Telling people to obey weird little coding
> conventions is no answer. (If everyone reliably did that, we'd not
> need pgindent in the first place.)
>
pgindent gives us so many advanates, why worry about a small thing like
0xffU. I will add to the patch I supply in the pgindent directory to
handle U also.
> It appears that BSD indent doesn't have a problem with 0xnnnL, so
> teaching it about 0xnnnU can't be that hard if you have the source.
> (I don't...)
>
> Maybe it is time to take another look at GNU indent?
You don't want to go there. See the tools/pgindent directory for an
explaination. GNU indent has many bugs that wack the code silly. Try
running any directory with GNU indent and compare it to the pgindent
version.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
