Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc
Date
Msg-id 199905091456.XAA00493@ext16.sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> This is all clearly part of the large object mess that we were in before
> you fixed large objects.
> 
> Do whatever you think is best for the long term.  Large objects were so
> terribly fragile in previous releases, we might as well advertise them
> again as now working 100% of the time.  If the new behaviour changes
> existing apps, that is OK if the new behaviour is superior.  They will
> be thrilled to change their apps if the large object system now works
> better.
> 
> It would be different if the old system worked properly.

I have changed lo_read/lo_write so that they run under same memory
context as other LO calls.
---
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Newer list
Next
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed...