Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 July 2008

• 00:28   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Tom Lane
• 01:15   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Alvaro Herrera
• 02:21   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 07:59   Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) Richard Huxton
• 09:45   Re: Planned obsolescence in identify_system_timezone() Gregory Stark
• 09:56   Re: Bucket and batch Gregory Stark
• 11:00   Re: Explain XML patch Gregory Stark
• 11:34   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Mark Cave-Ayland
• 12:43   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Guillaume Smet
• 12:55   Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) Robert Treat
• 13:12   Re: TODO assignment Zdenek Kotala
• 13:15   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Mark Cave-Ayland
• 13:19   Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes Zdenek Kotala
• 13:53   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: Confusing message in log file Gurjeet Singh
• 14:29   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Zdenek Kotala
• 14:35   Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes Zdenek Kotala
• 14:37   Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme Robert Treat
• 14:39   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 14:51   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Marko Kreen
• 14:52   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 15:04   [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Radek Strnad
• 15:15   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Marko Kreen
• 15:22   Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) Richard Huxton
• 15:25   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Bruce Momjian
• 15:33   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Marko Kreen
• 15:37   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 Marko Kreen
• 16:33   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 17:33   Access to localized_str_tolower() David E. Wheeler
• 17:41   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() Bruce Momjian
• 17:47   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() David E. Wheeler
• 18:06   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Magnus Hagander
• 18:09   Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE TABLE with IDENTITY Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() Bruce Momjian
• 18:36   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() David E. Wheeler
• 18:38   Re: triggers on prepare, commit, rollback... ? Bruce Momjian
• 18:39   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() Bruce Momjian
• 18:46   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme Shane Ambler
• 18:49   Location for pgstat.stat Magnus Hagander
• 18:51   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Tom Lane
• 18:57   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Magnus Hagander
• 18:59   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Magnus Hagander
• 18:59   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() Tom Lane
• 19:04   Re: Access to localized_str_tolower() David E. Wheeler
• 19:07   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Tom Lane
• 19:10   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Magnus Hagander
• 19:11   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Tom Lane
• 19:17   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Tom Lane
• 19:18   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Magnus Hagander
• 19:28   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Alvaro Herrera
• 19:32   Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme Gregory Stark
• 19:34   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Magnus Hagander
• 19:49   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Greg Smith
• 20:02   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Tom Lane
• 20:19   Commitfest status? Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: Commitfest status? Joe Conway
• 21:04   Re: Commitfest status? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:12   Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? Tom Lane
• 21:38   Re: Commitfest status? Josh Berkus
• 22:07   Re: TODO assignment Josh Berkus
• 22:09   Please claim review items for commit fest! Josh Berkus
• 22:11   Please claim review items for commit fest! Josh Berkus
• 22:31   OT: Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme Steve Crawford
• 23:13   Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme Gregory Williamson

2 July 2008

• 02:33   Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Tom Lane
• 03:56   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Greg Sabino Mullane
• 04:22   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 05:32   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Joshua D. Drake
• 06:26   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Tom Lane
• 06:38   Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? Magnus Hagander
• 07:18   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Guillaume Lelarge
• 07:29   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 07:37   Re: Commitfest status? Zdenek Kotala
• 07:58   Re: Commitfest status? Zdenek Kotala
• 10:37   Re: Please claim review items for commit fest! Marko Kreen
• 10:42   Re: Please claim review items for commit fest! Dave Page
• 10:44   Re: Please claim review items for commit fest! Marko Kreen
• 10:53   Re: Please claim review items for commit fest! Dave Page
• 11:10   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 11:39   A Windows x64 port of MySQL Ken Camann
• 11:42   pg_compresslog/pg_decompresslog Mario Weilguni
• 12:01   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Zdenek Kotala
• 12:02   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Zdenek Kotala
• 12:11   Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes Magnus Hagander
• 12:39   Re: Please claim review items for commit fest! Gregory Stark
• 13:19   Re: A Windows x64 port of MySQL Bernd Helmle
• 14:10   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Magnus Hagander
• 14:10   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 14:29   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Alvaro Herrera
• 15:16   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Alvaro Herrera
• 16:13   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Zdenek Kotala
• 16:39   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 16:44   Re: Postgresql 8.3 issue Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: [GENERAL] pg crashing Magnus Hagander
• 16:52   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Alvaro Herrera
• 18:13   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 18:22   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Gregory Stark
• 19:12   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:19   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Teodor Sigaev
• 19:21   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Radek Strnad
• 19:32   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Ken Camann
• 19:43   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 19:48   Re: Commitfest status? Merlin Moncure
• 20:14   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Dave Page
• 21:11   Re: Commitfest status? Robert Treat
• 21:41   Working on native Windows x64 version of PostgreSQL Ken Camann
• 21:50   Re: Working on native Windows x64 version of PostgreSQL Dave Page
• 23:06   Re: [GENERAL] pg crashing Tom Lane
• 23:11   WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 23:19   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Tom Lane
• 23:39   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Decibel!
• 23:48   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Decibel!

3 July 2008

• 00:01   Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands Joshua D. Drake
• 00:40   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 01:03   Re: Location for pgstat.stat Tom Lane
• 01:33   Re: pg_dump lock timeout Stephen Frost
• 02:17   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others Yoshiyuki Asaba
• 03:00   Re: DTrace probes. Robert Treat
• 03:27   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others David Fetter
• 04:04   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 04:27   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Ken Camann
• 04:44   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 04:45   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 04:45   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 04:45   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 04:45   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 04:57   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others Yoshiyuki Asaba
• 05:14   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 05:47   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Ken Camann
• 07:19   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Teodor Sigaev
• 07:20   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Mark Mielke
• 07:31   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Teodor Sigaev
• 08:11   Concurrent Restores Volkan YAZICI
• 08:15   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump lock timeout Marko Kreen
• 08:58   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Mark Cave-Ayland
• 09:29   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Gregory Stark
• 09:31   Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes Simon Riggs
• 09:35   Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing Mark Cave-Ayland
• 10:02   Attaching and using the Postgres shared memory segment Paul van den Bogaard
• 10:22   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes Pavel Stehule
• 10:46   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes Simon Riggs
• 10:48   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 11:11   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:34   Re: Attaching and using the Postgres shared memory segment Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:29   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes Simon Riggs
• 12:53   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Peter Eisentraut
• 12:55   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes Gregory Stark
• 12:55   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump lock timeout daveg
• 13:13   Command execution Aaron Spiteri
• 13:19   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes Simon Riggs
• 13:23   Re: Command execution A. Kretschmer
• 13:27   Re: Command execution Csaba Nagy
• 13:35   Re: Command execution Aaron Spiteri
• 14:37   Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes Bernd Helmle
• 14:41   Switching between terminals cinu
• 14:59   Re: Switching between terminals Csaba Nagy
• 15:09   Re: Switching between terminals Gregory Stark
• 15:35   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump lock timeout Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 16:03   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 16:10   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Alvaro Herrera
• 16:58   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 17:18   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Mark Mielke
• 17:41   Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Garick Hamlin
• 17:43   Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes Pavel Stehule
• 17:54   Re: Auto-explain patch Alex Hunsaker
• 18:01   Re: Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Tom Lane
• 18:52   CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 18:55   Re: Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Garick Hamlin
• 19:03   Re: CommitFest rules Marko Kreen
• 19:06   Re: CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 19:13   Re: CommitFest rules Joshua D. Drake
• 19:14   Re: CommitFest rules Merlin Moncure
• 19:25   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 19:34   Re: CommitFest rules Alex Hunsaker
• 19:45   Re: CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 20:42   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 20:45   Re: CommitFest rules Merlin Moncure
• 21:35   Re: the un-vacuumable table Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: CommitFest rules Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 22:16   Re: CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 22:48   Re: the un-vacuumable table Tom Lane

4 July 2008

• 00:58   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others Robert Haas
• 02:03   Re: [PATCHES] Removal of the patches email list Russell Smith
• 02:03   Truncated queries when select * from pg_stat_activity - wishlist / feature request Dave Witt
• 02:09   Re: Truncated queries when select * from pg_stat_activity - wishlist / feature request Alvaro Herrera
• 05:57   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 07:08   Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2 Tom Raney
• 07:32   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:21   Re: the un-vacuumable table Gregory Stark
• 08:26   Multi-column GIN Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:41   Re: [PATCHES] Multi-column GIN Teodor Sigaev
• 08:51   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:52   Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2 Peter Eisentraut
• 09:13   Re: [PATCHES] Multi-column GIN Oleg Bartunov
• 09:30   log_rotation_age integer overflow display quirk Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 09:43   Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes Simon Riggs
• 10:27   Re: [GENERAL] pg crashing Magnus Hagander
• 10:56   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL chris
• 12:39   Re: Concurrent Restores Zdenek Kotala
• 13:20   Re: log_rotation_age integer overflow display quirk Bernd Helmle
• 14:42   Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Zdenek Kotala
• 15:06   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Alvaro Herrera
• 15:54   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2 Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in win32 shmem name generation: * Don't cut Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Zdenek Kotala
• 17:29   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Zdenek Kotala
• 17:30   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Alvaro Herrera
• 17:34   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Alvaro Herrera
• 17:45   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Zdenek Kotala
• 17:53   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Zdenek Kotala
• 18:56   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in win32 shmem name generation: * Don't cut Magnus Hagander
• 19:12   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in win32 shmem name generation: * Don't cut Alvaro Herrera
• 19:20   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Heikki Linnakangas

5 July 2008

• 05:40   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 05:54   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 06:11   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 08:48   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 09:34   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in win32 shmem name generation: * Don't cut Magnus Hagander
• 09:58   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Gregory Stark
• 09:58   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Gregory Stark
• 10:04   introduction of WIP window function patch H.Harada
• 14:20   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:13   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 16:35   time_stamp type Stephen R. van den Berg
• 17:16   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch Simon Riggs
• 18:40   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch H.Harada
• 18:47   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch H.Harada
• 20:07   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch Simon Riggs
• 22:07   Re: Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Robert Treat
• 22:08   Re: CommitFest rules Robert Treat
• 22:10   Re: CommitFest rules Robert Treat
• 22:15   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 22:44   Re: CommitFest rules Robert Treat
• 23:13   Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Andrew Dunstan

6 July 2008

• 00:40   Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL Ron Mayer
• 00:47   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 00:47   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 00:47   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 04:51   Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Tom Lane
• 05:19   Re: time_stamp type Tom Lane
• 05:29   Re: CommitFest rules Tom Lane
• 06:31   PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 08:39   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch H.Harada
• 09:17   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch Simon Riggs
• 09:44   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 10:15   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch H.Harada
• 10:48   Re: CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 12:58   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others Michael Meskes
• 13:01   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others David Fetter
• 13:44   Re: CommitFest rules Bruce Momjian
• 14:58   Re: CommitFest rules Brendan Jurd
• 15:37   Re: Auto-explain patch Simon Riggs
• 17:58   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 19:50   Re: log_rotation_age integer overflow display quirk Tom Lane
• 22:02   Priority of timezone names vs abbreviations in AT TIME ZONE Tom Lane

7 July 2008

• 01:29   Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:03   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:28   pg_ctl -w with postgresql.conf in non-default path 
• 07:05   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Simon Riggs
• 07:22   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Yoshiyuki Asaba
• 07:46   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Zdenek Kotala
• 13:07   Re: pg_ctl -w with postgresql.conf in non-default path Andrew Dunstan
• 13:22   Missing descriptions for aggregates Bernd Helmle
• 13:45   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Alvaro Herrera
• 13:49   Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Bernd Helmle
• 13:58   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 14:03   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Alvaro Herrera
• 14:33   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 14:42   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Zdenek Kotala
• 14:51   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Bernd Helmle
• 15:01   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Andrew Dunstan
• 15:06   deadlock_timeout Simon Riggs
• 15:07   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Tom Lane
• 15:08   Userset logging Simon Riggs
• 15:10   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Andrew Dunstan
• 15:16   Re: deadlock_timeout Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Bernd Helmle
• 15:30   Re: deadlock_timeout Simon Riggs
• 15:41   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] Peter Eisentraut
• 15:58   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 16:12   Re: pg_ctl -w with postgresql.conf in non-default path HIRANO Yoshitaka
• 16:32   Re: [PATCHES] column level privileges Stephen Frost
• 16:58   Re: Auto-explain patch Simon Riggs
• 17:09   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 17:20   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 17:21   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 17:29   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] Josh Berkus
• 17:36   Re: CommitFest rules Josh Berkus
• 17:37   Re: CommitFest rules Josh Berkus
• 17:47   Re: CommitFest rules Brendan Jurd
• 17:48   Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others David Fetter
• 18:04   Re: CommitFest rules Josh Berkus
• 18:08   Questions and notes on CommitFest patch review Josh Berkus
• 18:18   Windows 64-bit work in progress patch Ken Camann
• 18:23   Re: CommitFest rules Jaime Casanova
• 18:38   Re: CommitFest rules Tom Lane
• 18:44   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:47   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 18:54   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:57   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Zdenek Kotala
• 18:59   GEQO Publications Adriano Lange
• 19:01   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 19:01   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Zdenek Kotala
• 19:03   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 19:06   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 19:10   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Pavel Stehule
• 19:16   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Zdenek Kotala
• 19:21   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 19:23   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 19:26   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 19:33   Re: the un-vacuumable table Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Pavel Stehule
• 19:38   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 19:49   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Pavel Stehule
• 19:50   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Zdenek Kotala
• 20:10   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 20:15   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 20:59   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Gregory Stark
• 21:05   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 21:09   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 21:16   8.1 index corruption woes Alvaro Herrera
• 21:28   Re: Exposing quals Simon Riggs
• 21:55   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 22:04   Re: the un-vacuumable table Andrew Hammond
• 22:50   Re: Exposing quals andrew@dunslane.net
• 23:07   \SET QUIET and \timing David E. Wheeler
• 23:09   Re: \SET QUIET and \timing David E. Wheeler
• 23:24   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 23:26   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 23:27   New relkind (was Re: Exposing quals) David Fetter
• 23:37   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 23:58   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane

8 July 2008

• 00:04   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 00:09   Data type OID numbers fixed? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 00:29   Re: \SET QUIET and \timing David E. Wheeler
• 00:29   Re: \SET QUIET and \timing Tom Lane
• 00:34   Re: Data type OID numbers fixed? Alvaro Herrera
• 00:36   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 Tom Lane
• 00:38   Re: Data type OID numbers fixed? Tom Lane
• 00:42   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 David E. Wheeler
• 00:47   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 00:50   Re: Data type OID numbers fixed? imad
• 00:52   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Tom Lane
• 01:04   PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 01:17   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Alvaro Herrera
• 01:28   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Tom Lane
• 01:29   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:57   Re: CommitFest rules Bruce Momjian
• 02:01   Re: Missing descriptions for aggregates Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   Re: deadlock_timeout Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   Re: Windows 64-bit work in progress patch Bruce Momjian
• 02:18   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Alvaro Herrera
• 02:57   SSL configure patch: review Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 03:14   Re: SSL configure patch: review Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 04:06   Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 04:30   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] KaiGai Kohei
• 05:28   CONNECT BY and WITH ... Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 05:56   Re: New relkind (was Re: Exposing quals) Simon Riggs
• 06:31   Re: CONNECT BY and WITH ... David Fetter
• 06:45   Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes Simon Riggs
• 06:55   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:15   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 Zdenek Kotala
• 07:26   Re: CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 08:25   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 09:01   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:09   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] KaiGai Kohei
• 09:16   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Simon Riggs
• 09:32   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 09:50   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:03   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 10:19   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:26   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 12:25   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Simon Riggs
• 12:43   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Decibel!
• 12:45   Re: CommitFest rules Simon Riggs
• 13:20   Re: New relkind (was Re: Exposing quals) Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 13:32   Re: [PATCHES] Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Alvaro Herrera
• 13:49   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: CommitFest rules Gregory Stark
• 14:31   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Tom Lane
• 14:51   Re: Exposing quals Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:54   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Andrew Dunstan
• 15:03   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:14   Re: Exposing quals Simon Riggs
• 15:23   Re: Exposing quals Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:24   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Joshua D. Drake
• 15:29   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 15:39   Re: Exposing quals David Fetter
• 15:43   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 15:47   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Simon Riggs
• 15:58   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Joshua D. Drake
• 16:06   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Simon Riggs
• 16:10   Re: [PATCHES] Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Jaime Casanova
• 16:13   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 16:16   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 16:31   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Josh Berkus
• 16:33   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Michael Paesold
• 16:35   Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Josh Berkus
• 16:58   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] Josh Berkus
• 17:01   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 17:25   Identifier case folding notes Peter Eisentraut
• 17:34   Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Andrew Dunstan
• 17:41   Re: Identifier case folding notes Simon Riggs
• 17:53   Re: Identifier case folding notes Tom Lane
• 18:10   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: Identifier case folding notes Peter Eisentraut
• 18:25   Re: Identifier case folding notes Tom Lane
• 18:42   Re: Exposing quals Jan Wieck
• 18:43   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 18:52   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 19:08   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 19:12   Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Florian G. Pflug
• 19:19   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 21:00   Re: Identifier case folding notes Josh Berkus
• 21:22   Re: Identifier case folding notes Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 21:33   Re: Identifier case folding notes Kevin Grittner
• 21:51   Re: Identifier case folding notes Ron Mayer
• 22:00   Re: Identifier case folding notes Kevin Grittner
• 22:30   Re: Identifier case folding notes Tom Lane
• 22:35   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 22:35   Re: Identifier case folding notes Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 23:01   Summary of some postgres portability issues Ken Camann
• 23:18   Re: Identifier case folding notes Andrew Dunstan
• 23:19   Re: Identifier case folding notes Gregory Stark
• 23:20   Re: Windows 64-bit work in progress patch Ken Camann

9 July 2008

• 00:37   Re: Identifier case folding notes Russell Smith
• 00:39   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 01:28   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Alvaro Herrera
• 06:11   ... takanori@sraoss.co.jp
• 07:11   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:35   Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:42   Re: Identifier case folding notes Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 07:59   Re: Identifier case folding notes Peter Eisentraut
• 08:21   Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues Peter Eisentraut
• 09:16   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 09:49   Re: Auto-explain patch ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 10:32   Re: Identifier case folding notes Tino Wildenhain
• 11:05   review: table function support Marko Kreen
• 11:17   Re: Auto-explain patch Simon Riggs
• 11:22   Re: Auto-explain patch Marko Kreen
• 11:42   Re: Identifier case folding notes Gregory Stark
• 12:01   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 12:06   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 12:15   Re: Auto-explain patch Marko Kreen
• 13:18   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Zdenek Kotala
• 14:09   CREATE CAST too strict? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:45   Re: Auto-explain patch Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: Auto-explain patch Simon Riggs
• 16:41   Security and Data Protection Issues Stuart Gundry
• 16:48   Re: Security and Data Protection Issues Jan Urbański
• 16:49   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 David E. Wheeler
• 17:51   Re: Identifier case folding notes Josh Berkus
• 17:56   Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets Josh Berkus
• 17:58   No answers on CommitFest procedures? Josh Berkus
• 18:00   CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Josh Berkus
• 18:13   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Pavan Deolasee
• 18:25   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Neil Conway
• 18:25   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Josh Berkus
• 18:28   Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Neil Conway
• 18:32   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Neil Conway
• 18:39   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:43   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Neil Conway
• 18:45   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 18:46   Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Josh Berkus
• 18:47   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:49   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Josh Berkus
• 18:51   Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 18:51   Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Neil Conway
• 18:58   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 19:03   Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues Ken Camann
• 19:11   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Alvaro Herrera
• 19:14   Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 20:30   Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures? Gregory Stark
• 20:41   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:43   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Aidan Van Dyk
• 20:46   Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:51   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 21:01   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Alvaro Herrera

10 July 2008

• 00:08   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 00:55   Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL Robert Hodges
• 03:15   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 03:55   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Tom Lane
• 05:49   Re: CommitFest rules Robert Treat
• 05:55   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 08:38   Re: Security and Data Protection Issues Stuart Gundry
• 08:43   Re: Security and Data Protection Issues Richard Huxton
• 09:44   Re: Auto-explain patch Simon Riggs
• 10:19   Re: Auto-explain patch Gregory Stark
• 10:32   Re: Security and Data Protection Issues Jan Urbański
• 10:42   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 10:52   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Gregory Stark
• 11:56   Re: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL Marko Kreen
• 12:13   initdb in current cvs head broken? Sushant Sinha
• 12:17   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 12:25   Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? Pavan Deolasee
• 12:48   Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? Andrew Dunstan
• 12:53   Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? Sushant Sinha
• 12:57   Re: CREATE CAST too strict? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:18   Re: CommitFest rules Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 14:23   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Tom Lane
• 14:28   Re: CommitFest rules Dave Page
• 14:31   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:44   Re: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL Robert Hodges
• 14:54   Re: CommitFest rules Tom Lane
• 15:00   UUID - Data type inefficient Kless
• 15:01   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Aidan Van Dyk
• 15:21   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Andrew Dunstan
• 15:26   Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Alvaro Herrera
• 15:34   Re: CREATE CAST too strict? Tom Lane
• 15:34   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 15:53   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Mark Mielke
• 16:01   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Mark Mielke
• 16:01   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Mark Mielke
• 16:11   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Aidan Van Dyk
• 16:13   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Joshua D. Drake
• 16:39   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient David E. Wheeler
• 16:40   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 16:49   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Kaare Rasmussen
• 16:56   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Gregory Stark
• 17:05   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 17:10   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Gregory Stark
• 17:24   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Tom Lane
• 17:27   digest Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 17:31   Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 18:02   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Gregory Stark
• 18:10   Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Josh Berkus
• 18:16   Re: digest A.M.
• 18:23   Re: UUID - Data type inefficient Kless
• 19:07   Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers? Tom Lane
• 19:49   Generating code coverage reports Michelle Caisse
• 20:12   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Tom Lane
• 20:15   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 20:19   Re: Generating code coverage reports Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Alvaro Herrera
• 20:32   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 20:37   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 21:24   [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Radek Strnad
• 21:25   Re: Generating code coverage reports Michelle Caisse
• 21:27   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 22:09   Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 23:13   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Oleg Bartunov

11 July 2008

• 04:29   Postgres 8.1 doesn't like pg_standby's -l option Gurjeet Singh
• 06:18   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 06:23   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 06:30   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 07:29   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs
• 07:29   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:33   Re: Auto-explain patch Dean Rasheed
• 10:02   Re: posix advises ... Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 10:10   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] KaiGai Kohei
• 10:12   Should SPI_gettypeid be extended to support returning the typmod? Gregory Stark
• 10:31   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 10:45   Re: CommitFest rules Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 11:05   Re: CommitFest rules Simon Riggs
• 14:00   Re: Should SPI_gettypeid be extended to support returning the typmod? Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: Auto-explain patch Simon Riggs
• 15:46   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 16:35   building postgres test examples in win32 claudio lezcano
• 16:57   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Jaime Casanova
• 17:10   _bt_delitems: change before WAL? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:02   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Alvaro Herrera
• 19:29   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Tom Lane
• 19:35   Re: _bt_delitems: change before WAL? Tom Lane
• 19:40   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Zdenek Kotala
• 19:53   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 19:55   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 20:06   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Zdenek Kotala
• 20:39   Change of site Simon Riggs
• 21:03   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Alvaro Herrera
• 21:09   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Simon Riggs
• 21:31   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 22:59   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 23:36   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Simon Riggs
• 23:45   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 23:52   Re: posix advises ... Gregory Stark
• 23:57   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Dave Page

12 July 2008

• 02:18   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 02:35   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 03:11   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 04:28   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 04:34   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 08:05   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 08:11   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Simon Riggs
• 08:56   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Dave Page
• 10:40   Re: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL chris
• 11:30   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 11:34   Re: posix advises ... Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 13:08   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:17   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Tom Lane
• 15:26   Re: posix advises ... Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Simon Riggs
• 16:04   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Tom Lane
• 16:41   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Simon Riggs
• 16:49   Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again) Tom Lane
• 19:18   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Jaime Casanova
• 19:52   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 20:07   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Tom Lane
• 20:50   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Tom Lane
• 20:59   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Jan Urbański
• 21:50   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 21:57   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler

13 July 2008

• 03:31   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 04:44   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 16:22   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 16:25   COPY command, support for mixing binary and text columns? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 16:48   Re: COPY command, support for mixing binary and text columns? Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 22:49   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 22:51   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 23:06   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 23:13   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler

14 July 2008

• 00:54   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 01:28   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 03:51   Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch Pavan Deolasee
• 03:59   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Alvaro Herrera
• 04:04   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 05:01   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Alvaro Herrera
• 05:06   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Tom Lane
• 06:37   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 06:39   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 07:21   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 07:47   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Oleg Bartunov
• 08:28   Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Kless
• 08:34   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:16   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Rudolf Lippan
• 12:38   Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments Oleg Bartunov
• 13:05   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Andrew Dunstan
• 13:49   testing locales and encodings Alvaro Herrera
• 14:09   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 15:23   Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch Tom Lane
• 15:33   Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error Knight, Doug
• 15:43   Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error Tom Lane
• 15:49   Postgres-R source code release Markus Wanner
• 15:51   Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error Dave Page
• 16:02   Re: Postgres-R source code release Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 16:55   Re: Postgres-R source code release Jonah H. Harris
• 17:16   Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch Gregory Stark
• 17:36   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type David E. Wheeler
• 17:37   A note about proargmodes and Pavel's pending patches Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 17:48   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 17:50   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 17:51   Re: testing locales and encodings David E. Wheeler
• 17:55   Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Andrew Dunstan
• 17:57   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 17:58   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 18:06   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 18:07   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Mark Mielke
• 18:11   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 18:24   Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch Gregory Stark
• 18:26   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Kless
• 18:27   Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error Knight, Doug
• 18:34   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type David E. Wheeler
• 18:47   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Andrew Dunstan
• 18:47   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Mark Mielke
• 18:49   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 19:05   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 19:10   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Gregory Stark
• 19:33   Re: 8.1 index corruption woes Decibel!
• 19:34   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues Bruce Momjian
• 19:39   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Mark Mielke
• 19:49   Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: Security and Data Protection Issues Bruce Momjian
• 20:12   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 21:20   Re: Postgres-R source code release David Fetter
• 21:35   Re: Postgres-R source code release Alvaro Herrera
• 21:41   Re: Postgres-R source code release David Fetter
• 21:57   Re: Postgres-R source code release Alvaro Herrera
• 22:57   Re: idea: storing view source in system catalogs Bruce Momjian
• 23:02   Re: Exposing quals David Fetter
• 23:04   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 23:21   Re: Postgres-R source code release Joshua D. Drake
• 23:55   Re: Postgres-R source code release David Fetter

15 July 2008

• 00:04   Re: Postgres-R source code release David E. Wheeler
• 00:21   Re: Postgres-R source code release Andrej Ricnik-Bay
• 03:22   Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence Bruce Momjian
• 04:08   Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ... Bruce Momjian
• 04:51   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Simon Riggs
• 04:54   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Sushant Sinha
• 05:07   Re: posix advises ... Greg Smith
• 05:12   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 07:25   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 08:24   Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:25   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Simon Riggs
• 09:30   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Teodor Sigaev
• 09:56   Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily? Xiao Meng
• 11:38   [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 12:06   Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily? Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:18   Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily? Xiao Meng
• 13:55   Re: Hint Bits and Write I/O Bruce Momjian
• 14:09   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily? Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily? Jonah H. Harris
• 14:35   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily? Jonah H. Harris
• 15:03   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Tom Lane
• 15:05   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 15:31   Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: Postgres-R source code release Markus Wanner
• 16:49   Postgres-R: current state of development Markus Wanner
• 16:51   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Kless
• 17:45   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 18:25   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 19:43   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Mark Mielke
• 19:58   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Kless
• 21:29   Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type Andrew Dunstan
• 21:59   Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL Alvaro Herrera
• 22:22   Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch Pavel Stehule
• 22:24   Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 22:33   Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL Alvaro Herrera
• 22:56   Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 23:15   Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch Tom Lane

16 July 2008

• 00:40   gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only Xiao Meng
• 00:46   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:49   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 01:22   Re: rfc: add pg_dump options to dump output Bruce Momjian
• 01:57   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 02:49   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 03:59   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 Tom Lane
• 04:02   Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch Tom Lane
• 04:15   Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch Decibel!
• 04:17   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Sushant Sinha
• 05:06   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 David E. Wheeler
• 05:12   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:52   Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint Greg Smith
• 05:54   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP David Fetter
• 05:55   PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 07:34   postmaster.pid not visible cinu
• 09:37   Re: gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only Xiao Meng
• 10:29   Re: gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only Xiao Meng
• 12:37   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump lock timeout daveg
• 12:48   temp table problem Abbas
• 16:06   autovacuum crash due to null pointer Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: Overhauling GUCS Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   Re: ExecuteTruncate quirk: expects a unique list of relations Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 18:22   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 Robert Treat
• 18:38   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 19:35   Re: Postgres-R source code release Markus Wanner
• 19:36   Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 19:55   Re: Postgres-R: current state of development Dimitri Fontaine
• 20:57   avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity Jan Urbański
• 22:53   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Oleg Bartunov
• 23:12   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Sushant Sinha
• 23:29   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Oleg Bartunov

17 July 2008

• 00:53   Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: Change lock requirements for adding a trigger Bruce Momjian
• 03:47   small bug in hlCover Sushant Sinha
• 05:26   Re: avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity Tom Lane
• 05:35   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow TRUNCATE foo, foo to succeed, per report from Nikhils. Tom Lane
• 05:53   Re: Postgres-R source code release David Fetter
• 06:28   Re: avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity Jan Urbański
• 06:35   Re: avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity Jan Urbański
• 07:29   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch David Fetter
• 08:57   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:21   Re: introduction of WIP window function patch H.Harada
• 09:26   [PATCH]-hash index improving Xiao Meng
• 09:40   WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:46   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 Michael Paesold
• 11:38   hash distinct Pavel Stehule
• 12:04   Re: hash distinct Jonah H. Harris
• 12:11   Re: hash distinct Pavel Stehule
• 14:15   Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer Alvaro Herrera
• 14:34   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 14:40   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Alvaro Herrera
• 15:48   Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer Alvaro Herrera
• 15:50   Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer Alvaro Herrera
• 15:55   Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter
• 17:16   Re: postmaster.pid not visible Decibel!
• 17:21   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Alvaro Herrera
• 17:31   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 17:35   Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer Alvaro Herrera
• 17:48   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 17:54   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall
• 18:02   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall
• 18:08   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 18:12   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Alvaro Herrera
• 18:47   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 20:24   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 21:01   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall
• 21:03   Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer Alvaro Herrera
• 21:18   Re: ecpg generated files ignorable? Alvaro Herrera
• 22:28   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Tom Lane
• 22:52   Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto Marc Munro
• 23:03   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs
• 23:13   TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane
• 23:38   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Dann Corbit

18 July 2008

• 00:14   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving David Fetter
• 00:40   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 01:19   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Sushant Sinha
• 01:41   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:20   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Bruce Momjian
• 03:48   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Alvaro Herrera
• 03:54   Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 04:26   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 04:35   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display. Tom Lane
• 04:38   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane
• 04:39   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 04:50   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 04:51   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane
• 04:53   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan
• 05:01   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Tom Lane
• 05:11   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 05:14   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule
• 05:19   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane
• 05:21   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 05:37   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Tom Lane
• 06:01   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule
• 06:23   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan
• 07:47   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs
• 08:22   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Marko Kreen
• 08:39   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 Michael Paesold
• 10:07   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Gregory Stark
• 10:29   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs
• 10:41   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris
• 13:09   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 13:42   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Alvaro Herrera
• 13:45   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 David Fetter
• 14:18   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches David Fetter
• 15:02   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:06   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Gregory Stark
• 15:07   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Jonah H. Harris
• 15:07   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane
• 15:09   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter
• 15:16   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Tom Lane
• 15:19   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter
• 15:21   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Gregory Stark
• 15:47   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 15:53   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 15:55   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 16:02   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Marko Kreen
• 16:16   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 16:29   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera
• 16:55   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 17:16   Re: typedefs for indent Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 17:20   Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Bruce Momjian
• 17:23   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall
• 17:30   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Erik
• 20:43   Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall

19 July 2008

• 01:12   Re: temp table problem Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 02:13   Re: temp table problem Robert Haas
• 03:30   Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane
• 04:34   Re: phrase search Sushant Sinha
• 07:42   Re: phrase search Oleg Bartunov
• 10:41   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris
• 11:16   gsoc, oprrest function for text search Jan Urbański
• 11:47   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Adriaan van Os
• 12:41   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Jan Urbański
• 15:52   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 15:54   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 16:39   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Florian G. Pflug
• 23:17   Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Peter Eisentraut
• 23:43   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Peter Eisentraut

20 July 2008

• 00:46   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera
• 05:36   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane
• 06:15   Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Bruce Momjian
• 07:50   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Peter Eisentraut
• 13:48   Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: temp table problem Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:42   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii
• 16:04   Re: temp table problem Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tom Lane
• 17:18   CommitFest dragging? Josh Berkus
• 17:22   Re: CommitFest dragging? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:05   Re: CommitFest dragging? Tom Lane
• 22:30   Re: CommitFest dragging? Andrew Chernow
• 22:38   Re: CommitFest dragging? Josh Berkus
• 23:19   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii

21 July 2008

• 00:00   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter
• 01:14   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:16   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Radek Strnad
• 01:50   Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql? laser
• 05:54   Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence Tom Lane
• 08:40   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 08:53   Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:33   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Markus Wanner
• 11:35   overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 13:47   Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark
• 14:06   WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:14   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Markus Wanner
• 14:23   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:29   Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 14:31   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Pavel Stehule
• 14:44   Re: overlaps performance Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Markus Wanner
• 15:02   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 15:23   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:27   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain
• 16:17   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:50   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain
• 18:56   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 19:43   Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus
• 19:59   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan
• 20:03   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Robert Lor
• 20:07   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:18   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marc Munro
• 20:18   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:19   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:22   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 20:28   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Sullivan
• 20:37   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:39   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:55   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Cramer
• 20:58   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Decibel!
• 21:12   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 21:27   Re: typedefs for indent Andrew Dunstan
• 21:50   Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 22:14   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan
• 22:16   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Alvaro Herrera
• 23:39   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane
• 23:59   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane

22 July 2008

• 01:29   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 01:33   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 02:19   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 02:51   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 04:05   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Owen Hartnett
• 04:33   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Matthew T. O'Connor
• 06:33   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:08   Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner
• 09:49   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut
• 09:49   Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark
• 10:43   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris
• 11:00   pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 11:29   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 12:25   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 12:43   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 13:39   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark
• 13:47   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Page
• 14:34   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 14:40   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Andrew Sullivan
• 14:45   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 14:50   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 15:01   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark
• 15:01   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 15:09   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Christopher Browne
• 15:42   Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 15:46   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 15:52   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 15:56   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs
• 16:23   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 16:37   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Dimitri Fontaine
• 16:45   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Andrew Dunstan
• 16:49   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Joshua D. Drake
• 16:57   Re: Plans for 8.4 Markus Wanner
• 18:59   Re: phrase search Teodor Sigaev
• 19:00   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Shane Ambler
• 19:07   Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 19:40   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 19:40   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera
• 19:42   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 19:58   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 20:02   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 20:05   Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 20:09   Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 20:13   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 20:15   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 20:21   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs
• 20:24   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Simon Riggs
• 20:28   Slony-I playing with system catalog chris
• 20:31   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: Plans for 8.4 David E. Wheeler
• 21:01   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 21:14   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 21:18   Re: Plans for 8.4 Tom Lane
• 21:24   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus
• 21:26   Re: Plans for 8.4 Markus Wanner
• 21:32   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Decibel!
• 21:38   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 21:40   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 21:43   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner
• 21:45   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 21:54   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 22:10   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Simon Riggs
• 22:13   Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 22:39   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Marko Kreen
• 23:02   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 23:10   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Decibel!

23 July 2008

• 00:53   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Martin Zaun
• 00:58   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Jens-Wolfhard Schicke
• 02:57   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Xiao Meng
• 02:57   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Xiao Meng
• 03:30   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 03:36   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Dann Corbit
• 04:00   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 04:13   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 04:48   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 05:42   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner
• 06:21   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 07:01   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs
• 07:03   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs
• 07:17   Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner
• 09:42   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Alexey Klyukin
• 09:48   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 09:57   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 10:31   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner
• 10:53   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs
• 11:36   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Teodor Sigaev
• 11:44   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Oleg Bartunov
• 13:40   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 13:54   WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:15   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:36   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:50   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Marko Kreen
• 14:59   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Tom Lane
• 15:05   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 15:19   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 16:25   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Greg Sabino Mullane
• 16:36   Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Kenneth Marshall
• 16:45   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 16:54   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Sushant Sinha
• 17:06   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Peter Eisentraut
• 17:49   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Matthew T. O'Connor
• 17:50   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner
• 18:04   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marko Kreen
• 18:55   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:04   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Zdenek Kotala
• 19:06   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 19:06   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dimitri Fontaine
• 19:07   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 19:14   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Kevin Grittner
• 20:08   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 20:17   Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Manoel Henrique
• 20:20   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 20:23   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Dann Corbit
• 20:27   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner
• 20:31   Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Oleg Bartunov
• 20:44   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Alvaro Herrera
• 20:48   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Manoel Henrique
• 20:53   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Andrew Dunstan
• 21:08   PostgreSQL extensions packaging Dimitri Fontaine
• 21:26   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Dann Corbit
• 22:59   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs

24 July 2008

• 00:55   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:56   Re: PostgreSQL extensions packaging Tom Dunstan
• 01:06   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 David Fetter
• 01:19   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:32   Re: PostgreSQL extensions packaging Tom Dunstan
• 02:06   issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Martin Zaun
• 03:21   Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Andrew Dunstan
• 04:57   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:49   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane
• 06:11   Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Tom Lane
• 06:32   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:43   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut
• 07:44   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner
• 07:45   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Peter Eisentraut
• 07:51   Re: PostgreSQL extensions packaging Dimitri Fontaine
• 08:18   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jeroen Vermeulen
• 08:30   Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Martin Zaun
• 09:20   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marko Kreen
• 09:45   Additional psql requirements Simon Riggs
• 10:09   Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 12:28   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE Simon Riggs
• 13:00   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Simon Riggs
• 13:53   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 14:03   Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Hiroshi Saito
• 14:35   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Hannu Krosing
• 14:35   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE Simon Riggs
• 15:11   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala
• 15:39   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Hannu Krosing
• 15:45   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 16:05   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Hannu Krosing
• 16:09   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 16:15   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Theo Schlossnagle
• 16:17   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Jaime Casanova
• 17:01   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 17:09   Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Greg Sabino Mullane
• 18:02   Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Joshua D. Drake
• 18:19   So, what's the "base dn" in an LDAP URL again? Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 18:30   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 19:19   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 19:24   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 19:32   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Hannu Krosing
• 20:30   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 21:56   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Robert Haas
• 23:12   pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers Andrew Dunstan

25 July 2008

• 00:17   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 David Fetter
• 00:29   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:47   Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers Stephen Frost
• 01:00   Re: Additional psql requirements ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:18   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Tolley
• 04:32   [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich
• 05:11   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane
• 05:38   Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences) Jaime Casanova
• 05:47   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich
• 06:37   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Asko Oja
• 07:10   Re: Additional psql requirements Simon Riggs
• 07:18   Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers Simon Riggs
• 07:34   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE Simon Riggs
• 07:48   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 07:48   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala
• 07:52   Re: Additional psql requirements daveg
• 07:57   Re: Additional psql requirements Pavel Stehule
• 08:13   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 08:31   Re: Additional psql requirements Dave Page
• 08:36   Re: Additional psql requirements Pavel Stehule
• 08:41   Re: Additional psql requirements Dave Page
• 08:50   Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ? Bjorn Munch
• 08:51   Re: Additional psql requirements Simon Riggs
• 08:57   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 09:51   Re: Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences) Stephen Frost
• 10:57   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark
• 12:15   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Peter Eisentraut
• 14:17   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 14:33   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:38   [patch] gsoc, improving hash index v2 Xiao Meng
• 14:48   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Alvaro Herrera
• 15:13   Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 15:24   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich
• 15:26   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich
• 15:43   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Alvaro Herrera
• 16:26   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Hiroshi Saito
• 16:28   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark
• 16:30   Re: Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences) Jaime Casanova
• 16:44   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Alvaro Herrera
• 17:02   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 17:20   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Kevin Grittner
• 17:24   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Alvaro Herrera
• 17:25   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 17:26   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Tom Lane
• 17:57   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Hiroshi Saito
• 18:26   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 18:46   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Joshua D. Drake
• 19:06   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Manoel Henrique
• 19:23   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 19:32   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Joshua D. Drake
• 19:39   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs
• 19:51   Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ? Tom Lane
• 19:55   Re: Additional psql requirements Tom Lane
• 19:57   Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ? Dann Corbit
• 20:06   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Dann Corbit
• 20:11   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Andrew Dunstan
• 20:14   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Dann Corbit
• 20:18   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Ron Mayer
• 20:28   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Andrew Dunstan
• 20:29   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Dann Corbit
• 20:31   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs
• 21:01   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump daveg
• 21:19   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs
• 21:29   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Joshua D. Drake
• 21:39   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 21:50   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 21:58   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Davy Durham
• 22:11   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Gregory Stark
• 22:17   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Gregory Stark
• 23:31   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Jonah H. Harris
• 23:35   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Joshua D. Drake

26 July 2008

• 00:17   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Alvaro Herrera
• 00:28   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane
• 00:36   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump daveg
• 00:39   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Alvaro Herrera
• 00:45   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane
• 02:36   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera
• 03:46   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:09   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich
• 04:12   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane
• 04:22   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Ryan Bradetich
• 05:28   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Ron Mayer
• 05:38   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Tom Lane
• 08:23   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 09:02   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 09:03   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 09:29   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 10:29   Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization Gregory Stark
• 11:47   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan
• 12:21   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 13:08   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan
• 14:16   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Simon Riggs
• 14:50   Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan
• 15:10   pg_dump(all) library David Fetter
• 15:13   Re: pg_dump(all) library Stephen Frost
• 15:42   Executor question Andrew Gierth
• 16:06   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Kenneth Marshall
• 16:55   Re: pg_dump(all) library Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: pg_dump(all) library Joshua D. Drake
• 17:21   Re: Executor question Tom Lane
• 17:44   Re: pg_dump(all) library Andrew Dunstan
• 20:12   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 21:44   patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Robert Haas
• 21:49   Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Greg Smith
• 23:09   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane
• 23:44   Re: Auto-explain patch Tom Lane

27 July 2008

• 00:48   Search for version-numbered tclsh? Tom Lane
• 03:07   Re: Search for version-numbered tclsh? Andrew Dunstan
• 03:46   Re: Regd: TODO Item : Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE issue NOTICE messages ... Ramya Chandrasekar
• 23:04   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg

28 July 2008

• 00:45   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:40   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump additional options for performance daveg
• 06:55   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Pavel Stehule
• 07:28   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:30   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:16   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Zdenek Kotala
• 08:35   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 10:00   Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ? Bjorn Munch
• 10:26   window function v03 against HEAD H.Harada
• 10:27   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala
• 10:52   about postgres-r setup. leiyonghua
• 11:32   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala
• 11:35   gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Jan Urbański
• 11:50   Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 11:53   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Dave Cramer
• 12:41   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Marko Kreen
• 13:04   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Marko Kreen
• 13:09   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Andrew Dunstan
• 13:32   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Robert Haas
• 13:46   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:06   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 14:13   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Zdenek Kotala
• 14:16   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Asko Oja
• 15:20   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 15:31   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Hiroshi Saito
• 15:51   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Marko Kreen
• 15:58   Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane
• 15:59   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? Hiroshi Saito
• 16:12   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Greg Smith
• 16:17   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:17   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Andrew Dunstan
• 16:19   dblink security Marko Kreen
• 16:22   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Joshua D. Drake
• 16:34   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Gregory Stark
• 16:44   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 16:48   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marko Kreen
• 16:59   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Joshua D. Drake
• 17:06   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 17:40   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 17:54   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Dave Cramer
• 18:25   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? A.M.
• 18:29   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 18:36   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Andrew Garner
• 18:49   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 18:59   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 19:16   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 19:29   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 19:49   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 20:05   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:22   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
• 20:30   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Gregory Stark
• 20:40   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:04   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 21:30   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Decibel!
• 22:00   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 22:12   Re: CVS Head psql bug? Guillaume Smet
• 22:16   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dawid Kuroczko
• 22:24   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:48   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark
• 23:04   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 23:09   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Dunstan
• 23:13   Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane
• 23:18   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor
• 23:18   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane
• 23:39   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor
• 23:54   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor

29 July 2008

• 00:11   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane
• 00:53   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth
• 00:57   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 01:24   Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter
• 01:32   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 05:23   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor
• 06:09   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? tomas@tuxteam.de
• 06:42   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Pavel Stehule
• 07:24   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:27   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Jan Urbański
• 07:53   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut
• 07:58   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Peter Eisentraut
• 08:02   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:05   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Peter Eisentraut
• 08:41   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Peter Eisentraut
• 10:13   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 10:52   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Asko Oja
• 10:55   Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 10:56   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Asko Oja
• 10:56   Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Gregory Stark
• 11:08   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost
• 11:24   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Greg Sabino Mullane
• 12:21   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Peter Eisentraut
• 12:25   Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] KaiGai Kohei
• 12:25   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Peter Eisentraut
• 12:31   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Robert Haas
• 13:04   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost
• 13:11   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost
• 13:16   pg_regress inputdir Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway
• 13:30   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Zdenek Kotala
• 14:04   Re: Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 14:27   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:42   Location of ident code Magnus Hagander
• 14:44   Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera
• 14:57   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane
• 15:08   Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Tom Lane
• 15:48   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Gregory Stark
• 15:59   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 16:10   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 16:25   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing
• 16:46   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Asko Oja
• 16:59   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 17:03   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Greg Smith
• 17:10   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing
• 17:23   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Andrew Dunstan
• 18:01   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 18:03   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 18:21   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Robert Haas
• 18:41   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 18:54   Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 19:16   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Zdenek Kotala
• 19:17   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane
• 19:22   Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Zdenek Kotala
• 19:24   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql David Fetter
• 20:12   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 20:25   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 21:00   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 21:33   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 22:14   Re: about postgres-r setup. Markus Wanner
• 22:17   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Jan Urbański
• 22:35   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler

30 July 2008

• 00:00   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 00:52   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 02:12   modifying views Robert Haas
• 04:21   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 David Fetter
• 04:35   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor
• 05:29   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule
• 06:20   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing
• 06:40   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule
• 07:24   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Ryan Bradetich
• 07:45   Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 07:49   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 07:56   Re: about postgres-r setup. Markus Wanner
• 08:07   Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner
• 08:26   Re: about postgres-r setup. leiyonghua
• 08:29   printing raw parse tree Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:35   Re: pg_regress inputdir Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway
• 10:05   Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 10:09   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Gregory Stark
• 14:14   Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera
• 14:26   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing
• 14:48   Re: pg_regress inputdir Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway
• 14:51   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: printing raw parse tree Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Ryan Bradetich
• 15:18   Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule
• 16:51   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Martin Zaun
• 17:34   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 17:55   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Kevin Grittner
• 18:09   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 18:28   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 19:50   Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane
• 19:58   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 20:10   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 20:39   Re: Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS daveg
• 21:19   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Gregory Stark
• 21:29   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Gregory Stark
• 22:08   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Alvaro Herrera
• 22:13   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: printing raw parse tree Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:11   Re: printing raw parse tree Tom Lane
• 23:27   Re: Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS Tom Lane

31 July 2008

• 02:41   Re: Plans for 8.4 Henry B. Hotz
• 02:48   Re: Plans for 8.4 Stephen Frost
• 03:01   Re: Plans for 8.4 Tom Lane
• 04:09   opportunity for time on large itanium system Mark Wong
• 05:12   Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada
• 05:33   Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter
• 05:46   Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada
• 06:53   Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter
• 07:08   Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 07:50   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Dimitri Fontaine
• 08:40   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Andrew Sullivan
• 14:00   Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada
• 14:54   Dumping datconfig Magnus Hagander
• 14:59   Re: Plans for 8.4 Magnus Hagander
• 15:09   Re: Dumping datconfig Magnus Hagander
• 16:05   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:33   Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter
• 17:14   Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera
• 17:14   Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada
• 17:25   Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera
• 17:38   Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler
• 17:52   compilig libpq with borland 5.5 claudio lezcano
• 18:03   Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys David Fetter
• 18:24   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:26   Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter
• 18:29   Creating Universal OSX binaries Bruce Momjian
• 18:39   Re: Creating Universal OSX binaries Tom Lane
• 18:44   Re: Plans for 8.4 Henry B. Hotz
• 19:10   Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys Tom Lane
• 19:45   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Kris Jurka
• 20:06   Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys David Fetter
• 20:21   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor
• 20:43   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera
• 21:09   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera
• 21:23   Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera