Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 200807241043.26371.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Wednesday, 23. July 2008 schrieb Marko Kreen:
> And the idea to turn pgfoundry into CPAN
> is pointless.  An user may willing to throw random modules to his
> random perl script, but not to his whole db architecture.

Based on what reasoning?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1)
Next
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging