Re: Additional psql requirements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From daveg
Subject Re: Additional psql requirements
Date
Msg-id 20080725075223.GN24049@sonic.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Additional psql requirements  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Additional psql requirements
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:16:59AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:00 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > * access to version number
> > > * simple mechanism for conditional execution
> > > * ability to set substitution variables from command execution
> > > * conditional execution whether superuser or not
> > 
> > Can we use pgScript for such flow controls?
> > http://pgscript.projects.postgresql.org/INDEX.html
> > 
> > I'm not sure pgScript can be used in pgAdmin already, but if we support
> > it both psql and pgAdmin, the scripting syntax will be a defact standard
> > because they are the most major user interfaces to postgres. I think it is
> > not good to add another "dialect" that can be used only in psql.
> 
> I just want good way, not two imperfect ones.
> 
> And I'm not going to suggest having pgscript in core.

It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as
similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is
pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason.

-dg

-- 
David Gould       daveg@sonic.net      510 536 1443    510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: Additional psql requirements