Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id e51f66da0807280851q157d63e8sbd4c40bf98014fff@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?  ("Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/28/08, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
>  Please correct one mistake of mine...sorry.
>  This patch solved problem of win32.:-)

You mean the += -lws2_32 must be after PGXS?  Ok, but moving
the PGXS line is not right as it should after all variables
are set.  I moved the SHLIB_LINK += line instead.

Please test.

-- 
marko


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Saito"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm