Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Date
Msg-id 20080702170236.GV18252@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Why does a collation have a schema?
> 
> Because the SQL spec says so.  Also, if we don't put them in schemas,
> we have no nice way to distinguish built-in and user-defined collations,
> which creates a problem for pg_dump.

Oh, I see :-)  In that case, qualified_name would seem the right symbol
to use in the parser.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements