Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Date
Msg-id 13084.1215017742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Why does a collation have a schema?

Because the SQL spec says so.  Also, if we don't put them in schemas,
we have no nice way to distinguish built-in and user-defined collations,
which creates a problem for pg_dump.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level