Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There are two ways we
>> could do it: a bool column that is TRUE if the function is variadic,
>> or an oid column that is the variadic array's element type, or zero
>> if the function isn't variadic. The second would take more space but
>> would avoid having to do a catalog lookup to get the element type in
>> the case that the function is indeed variadic. I'm leaning to the
>> second way but wanted to know if anyone objected?
> If you go the second route, I'd vote for it being NULL if the
> function isn't variadic, unless that would play hell with the C side
> of the catalog code...
Getting rid of the check for null is *exactly* the point here --- AFAICT
that's what's eating all the time in the existing code.
regards, tom lane
