Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Date
Msg-id 4111.1216178778@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> So I guess my question is: what is wrong with the  properties for  
> citextsend/citextrecv

[ checks catalogs... ] textsend and textrecv are marked STABLE not
IMMUTABLE.  I am not totally sure about the reasoning offhand --- it
might be because their behavior depends on client_encoding.

> and what else might these failures be indicating  
> is wrong?

I think the other diffs are okay, they just reflect the fact that you're
depending on binary equivalence of text and citext.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch