Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date
Msg-id 18912.1215044473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Well, yeah, but that seems a very long way off.  In the meantime a lot
>> of people use the existing pgfoundry citext module.

> Indeed, but why isn't this code put there as well?

Well, actually, that might be the best thing to do with it.  But it
would be sensible to give it a code review anyway, no?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL