Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 12784.1216941567@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> ISTM that if that if you're willing to admit, even with caveats, that
> PL/perl, PL/tcl, or PL/python doesn't "need" to be in core, then
> excluding anything else from core on the basis that it doesn't need to
> be there is silly.

You are merely setting up a straw man, as no one has suggested such a
policy.  Any specific decision of this type is going to involve a
combination of factors, and that's only one.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers