Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Teodor Sigaev
Subject Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date
Msg-id 487220F9.4010403@sigaev.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
List pgsql-hackers
> I looked this over and it looks good in general.  I was only wondering
> about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
> right?
No, GinState->oneCol field signals to GinFormTuple and
gin_index_getattr/gintuple_get_attrnum about actual storage.

Single column index is binary compatible with current index :)

--
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements