Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

<p><font size="2">In further OT Gregory Stark wrote:<br /><br /> > > "Shane Ambler" <pgsql@Sheeky.Biz>
writes:<br/> > ><br /> > >  <br /> > >> Robert Treat wrote:<br /> > >><br /> >
>>    <br/> > >>>> So is that a "golf club gun"?<br /> > >>>>        <br /> >
>>>Careful what you wish for....<br /> > >>> <a
href="http://www.totallyabsurd.com/12gaugegolfclub.htm">http://www.totallyabsurd.com/12gaugegolfclub.htm</a><br/> >
>>>      <br/> > >> I reckon they watched Caddyshack (I think that was the one) and thought they<br
/>> >> could get the patent before someone actually tried selling them.<br /> > >>    <br /> >
><br/> > > Surely a movie counts as "published"!?<br /> > ><br /> > >  <br /> ><br /> > No
theterm is "prior art" leaving the lawyers to bill $400/hour while<br /> > they argue over whether or not Caddyshack
is"art". Though the movie<br /> > might have inspired this:<br /> > <a
href="http://www.rodenator.com/">http://www.rodenator.com/</a><br/> > <a
href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2386436112453851581">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2386436112453851581</a><br
/>> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2umEFHeo6mw">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2umEFHeo6mw</a><br />
><br/> > Looks fun as long as you don't do this:<br /> > <a
href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUKN2432304520080326">http://uk.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUKN2432304520080326</a><br
/><br/> In something of the same vein: <<a
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4593682.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4593682.stm</a>>... IMHO
thependejo got what was coming to him, though.<br /><br /> Back to work, but I really appreciate some of the
meanderingshere.<br /><br /> Greg Williamson<br /> Senior DBA<br /> DigitalGlobe<br /><br /> Confidentiality Notice:
Thise-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidentialand privileged information and must be protected in accordance with those provisions. Any unauthorized
review,use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
byreply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.<br /><br /> (My corporate masters made me say this.)<br
/><br/></font>