Re: [HACKERS] Explain XML patch v2 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Explain XML patch v2
Date
Msg-id 23468.1215187272@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Explain XML patch v2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Tom Raney:
>> Regarding the XML datum, in order to support that, will all users need �
>> to compile with libxml? �Are there any lighter weight solutions to �
>> serialize other than libxml?

> You can create XML without libxml.

Seems to me that anyone who wants this feature will probably also want
the existing libxml-based features, so they'll be building with libxml
anyway.  So I'd not be in favor of expending any extra code on a
roll-your-own solution.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation forks & FSM rewrite patches
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint