Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Date
Msg-id 87iqupredd.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> We are not in the business of getting spec-required semanticsTom> 80% right;

I guess that's why we still fold identifiers to lowercase, why our
timestamp implementation differs from the standard, why we used to
require AS for select-list aliases, why our views aren't updateable,
why we violate the spec for UNIQUE, why we don't have schema-unique
constraint names, why we don't implement MATCH PARTIAL, ...

The SQL spec is a Platonic ideal to which _none_ of the implementations
are more than a vague approximation.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?