Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, it won't make it harder to implement collations; but I worry that
>> people who have been relying on the citext syntax will have a hard time
>> migrating to collations. Perhaps if someone did the legwork to
>> determine exactly what that conversion would look like, it would assuage
>> the fear.
> I kind of assumed we would do it by implementing the COLLATE clause of
> the CREATE DOMAIN statement.
But to define such a domain, you'd have to commit to a case-insensitive
version of a specific collation, no? citext currently means "case
insensitive version of whatever the database's default collation is".
This might be worrying over nothing significant, but I'm not
convinced...
regards, tom lane
