Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Date
Msg-id 6929.1216151775@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> Well now that was cool to see. I got some failures, of course, but  
> nothing stands out to me as an obvious bug. I attach the diffs file  
> (with the citext.sql failure removed) for your perusal. What would be  
> the best way for me to resolve those permission issues?

Don't run the tests in a read-only directory, perhaps.

> Or do they matter for sanity-checking citext?

Hard to tell --- I'd suggest trying to get a clean run.  As for what you
have, the first diff hunk suggests you've got the wrong function
properties for citextsend/citextrecv.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Mielke
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type
Next
From: Kless
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type