Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Saito
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 00e401c8f0ca$a3a10d00$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D
Whole thread Raw
In response to Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi Marko-san.

Thanks! It is comfortable.:-)

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>


> On 7/28/08, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
>>  Please correct one mistake of mine...sorry.
>>  This patch solved problem of win32.:-)
> 
> You mean the += -lws2_32 must be after PGXS?  Ok, but moving
> the PGXS line is not right as it should after all variables
> are set.  I moved the SHLIB_LINK += line instead.
> 
> Please test.
> 
> -- 
> marko
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode