Re: CommitFest rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CommitFest rules
Date
Msg-id 16268.1215455877@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest rules  ("Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> On 7/5/08, Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
>> starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
>> email to the list, and add your patch to the next commitfest page. Does that
>> sound right?

> yeah! that was always the process... email to -hackers the proposal,
> design, discussion, etc... email to -patches the patch itself... the
> only change is that we are no longer using -patches for this but the
> commitfest page.

No, you still have to mail the actual patch to the lists, we've just
agreed that it's okay to send patches to -hackers.  Commitfest entries
pointing to random websites rather than the PG mail archives are not
acceptable.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitFest rules
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0