On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net> wrote:
>> Is DSM going to be in 8.4? The last I had heard, DSM+related
>> improvements weren't close to being guaranteed for this release. If
>> it doesn't make it, waiting another year and a half for something
>> easily fixed would be fairly unacceptable. Should I provide a patch
>> in the event that DSM doesn't make it?
>
> Can't hurt to submit a patch. Also, could you do something to help mitigate
> the worse case, something like don't update the stats in pg_class if the
> analyze finishes after a vacuum has finished since the current analyze
> started?
Yeah, I was thinking about that. It should actually be very easy to do that.
-Jonah
