Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

22 July 2008

• 01:29   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 01:33   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 02:19   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 02:51   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 04:05   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Owen Hartnett
• 04:33   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Matthew T. O'Connor
• 06:33   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:08   Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner
• 09:49   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut
• 09:49   Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark
• 10:43   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris
• 11:00   pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 11:29   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 12:25   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 12:43   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 13:39   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark
• 13:47   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Page
• 14:34   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 14:40   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Andrew Sullivan
• 14:45   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 14:50   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 15:01   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark
• 15:01   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 15:09   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Christopher Browne
• 15:42   Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 15:46   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala
• 15:52   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 15:56   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs
• 16:23   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 16:37   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Dimitri Fontaine
• 16:45   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Andrew Dunstan
• 16:49   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Joshua D. Drake
• 16:57   Re: Plans for 8.4 Markus Wanner
• 18:59   Re: phrase search Teodor Sigaev
• 19:00   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Shane Ambler
• 19:07   Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 19:40   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 19:40   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera
• 19:42   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 19:58   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 20:02   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev
• 20:05   Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 20:09   Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 20:13   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 20:15   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala
• 20:21   Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs
• 20:24   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Simon Riggs
• 20:28   Slony-I playing with system catalog chris
• 20:31   Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: Plans for 8.4 David E. Wheeler
• 21:01   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 21:14   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 21:18   Re: Plans for 8.4 Tom Lane
• 21:24   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus
• 21:26   Re: Plans for 8.4 Markus Wanner
• 21:32   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Decibel!
• 21:38   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 21:40   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 21:43   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner
• 21:45   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 21:54   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake
• 22:10   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Simon Riggs
• 22:13   Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs
• 22:39   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Marko Kreen
• 23:02   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 23:10   Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Decibel!