Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 20080721202818.GF32548@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:17:39PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>  pgFoundry ain't the CPAN, alas.

Maybe that's the problem that really needs solving?

One of the big Postgres features is its extensibility.  I agree that
the extensions can sometimes be hard to find, but surely the answer to
that is not an infinitely large source tarball?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marko Kreen"
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?