Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id F4771198-D048-46E2-8043-B5B688E0FA90@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Shane Ambler <pgsql@Sheeky.Biz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 21-Jul-08, at 4:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:17:39PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> pgFoundry ain't the CPAN, alas.
>
> Maybe that's the problem that really needs solving?
>
> One of the big Postgres features is its extensibility.  I agree that
> the extensions can sometimes be hard to find, but surely the answer to
> that is not an infinitely large source tarball?
>
> A
>
I'd have to agree with Andrew here. Making it easy to get extensions  
would solve lots of problems.

Dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11