Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

21 July 2008

• 00:00   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter
• 01:14   Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:16   Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Radek Strnad
• 01:50   Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql? laser
• 05:54   Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence Tom Lane
• 08:40   Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner
• 08:53   Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:33   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Markus Wanner
• 11:35   overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 13:47   Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark
• 14:06   WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:14   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Markus Wanner
• 14:23   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:29   Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 14:31   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Pavel Stehule
• 14:44   Re: overlaps performance Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Markus Wanner
• 15:02   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 15:23   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:27   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain
• 16:17   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:50   Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain
• 18:56   Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler
• 19:43   Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus
• 19:59   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan
• 20:03   Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) Robert Lor
• 20:07   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:18   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marc Munro
• 20:18   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:19   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:22   Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen
• 20:28   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Sullivan
• 20:37   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:39   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler
• 20:55   Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Cramer
• 20:58   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Decibel!
• 21:12   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh
• 21:27   Re: typedefs for indent Andrew Dunstan
• 21:50   Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris
• 22:14   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan
• 22:16   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Alvaro Herrera
• 23:39   Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane
• 23:59   Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane