Re: CommitFest rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: CommitFest rules
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10807100728h191eb05cxaf94cd2e71efc10a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CommitFest rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
> I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by "current commitfest".
> We probably need two separate terms for "the place to submit new
> patches" and "the place we are trying to commit patches from".

Well we have two separate links now, with hints as to their usage:

#  Upcoming CommitFest - add new patches here
# In-progress CommitFest - patch review underway here


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?