Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Saito
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 01f301c8ee7f$dc65b750$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D
Whole thread Raw
In response to Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> What is stopping you? Whether or not it works on Windows has (or should
> have) nothing to do with whether or not it is in core.

I think that plproxy is great. However, the windows user did not complain. 
Because, build was not easy. Therefore, pginstaller has not chosen. 
Then, I thought that I wanted to solve....but, I do not have a spare time.
Are they unrelated? I'm sorry if it is a noise.... 

> 
> Regarding your patch, the change w.r.t. the CONST token looks a bit odd
> - can you explain what you're doing and why?

Ad hoc in order to clarify a problem.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump